AF
Axos Financial, Inc. (AX)·Q1 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Axos delivered solid Q1 FY26 with GAAP EPS $1.94 and Adjusted EPS $2.07, driven by $1.6B net loan growth (incl. $1.0B from Verdant) and resilient credit; NIM compressed 9 bps QoQ to 4.75% largely from excess liquidity and a new sub-debt issue .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, Axos posted a significant EPS beat (Primary EPS $2.07* vs $1.88*, +$0.19, +10.3%) but a revenue miss ($306.1M* vs $319.2M*, -$13.0M, -4.1%); note “revenue” is S&P’s definition and differs from company-reported NII+non-interest income of $323.4M .
- Management raised loan growth outlook to low-to-mid-teens for the remainder of FY26; expects NIM to remain at high end of 4.25%–4.35% target, Verdant to add $150–$200M net new loans/leases per quarter, tax rate ~26–27% .
- Key positives: deposit growth (+$1.4B QoQ to $22.3B), higher non-interest-bearing deposits (~$3.4B), AUC/AUA reached $43B, and better asset quality (NPAs/assets 0.64%) .
- Stock catalysts: sustained low-teens loan growth from Verdant and floor plan lending, operating leverage from AI/tech modernization, and clarity on revenue trajectory vs consensus definitions .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Robust loan growth and deposit funding: $1.6B net loan growth (incl. $1.0B Verdant) and deposits up to $22.3B; non-interest-bearing deposits ~ $3.4B, aided by treasury management and client cash sorting .
- Credit quality improved: NPAs/assets fell to 0.64% (from 0.71%); net charge-offs to avg loans down to 0.11% . CEO: “We continue to generate high returns… nearly 16% ROE and 1.8% ROA” .
- Strategic M&A and tech: Verdant expected to be EPS accretive (2–3% FY26; 5–6% FY27); expanding AI use cases and launching Axos Professional Workstation to modernize securities platform .
What Went Wrong
- Margin compression: NIM fell 9 bps QoQ to 4.75% due to ~7 bps drag from excess liquidity and ~1 bp from new $200M sub debt at 7% .
- Lower fee run-rate QoQ: Non-interest income fell to $32.3M from $41.3M in Q4 (prior quarter benefited from a $12M mortgage loan sale gain) .
- Efficiency ratio worsened to 48.32% (from 46.87%) as expenses rose (Verdant-related costs and project spend); Verdant expected to add ~$8.5M per quarter to non-interest expense .
Financial Results
Core P&L and Margin Trends
YoY context (vs Q1 2025): NII $291.1M vs $292.0M (flat), Non-interest income $32.3M vs $28.6M (+13%), GAAP EPS $1.94 vs $1.93; Adjusted EPS $2.07 vs $1.96 .
Consensus vs Actuals (S&P Global definitions)
Note: Company-reported “net revenues” (NII + non-interest income) were $323.4M in Q1 FY26, reflecting a different revenue definition than S&P Global’s .
Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Breakdown (Q1 2026)
Key Performance Indicators
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We had a strong start to our fiscal 2026… nearly 16% ROE and 1.8% ROA” .
- “We expect our consolidated net interest margin… to stay at the high end of the 4.25% to 4.35% range” .
- “We expect the Verdant acquisition to add an incremental $150–$200 million of net new loans and operating leases per quarter… Our expectation is this acquisition will be accretive to our earnings per share by 2–3% in fiscal 2026 and by 5–6% in fiscal 2027” .
- “We have rapidly expanded the scope of workflows and use cases for artificial intelligence… to create greater operating leverage and improve the speed, quality, and cost of software development projects” .
- Expense discipline: “We will not grow more than $0.30 [expenses] for every $1 of net interest and non-interest income growth” (personnel + professional services) .
Q&A Highlights
- Credit/fraud risk controls: Management rejected high-profile deals due to weak structures; emphasized controls (e.g., direct verification with title insurers, noticing assignments) and vigilance across ABL/factoring/capital call lending .
- Fee income outlook: No notable one-timers in Q1; Verdant to contribute “a few million” of non-interest income per quarter .
- Verdant financing costs: On-balance sheet term securitizations carry ~5.5% cost, ~3.7 years WAM; plan to take out with deposits when feasible (cleanup calls ~10%) .
- Capital/ratios: Comfortable letting capital ratios drift down modestly to support mid-teens loan growth given ~16% ROE and strong reserve position .
- Floor plan lending: Pipeline building with MVRAs; several hundred million in assets and lines targeted by March 31 .
- Securities platform: Axos Professional Workstation in beta with BDs; aims to embed banking products for RIAs/clients over a 6–7 month rollout .
Estimates Context
- Q1 FY26 vs S&P Global: Primary EPS beat ($2.07* vs $1.88*), revenue miss ($306.1M* vs $319.2M*). Company’s reported “net revenues” (NII + non-interest income) were $323.4M, underscoring definitional differences in revenue reporting .
- Forward look: Q2 FY26 Primary EPS consensus ~ $2.06* and revenue ~$344.6M*, reflecting expected Verdant contribution and seasonal growth. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- EPS quality strong: Adjusted EPS $2.07 benefited from core growth; non-GAAP adjustments primarily reflect Verdant “Day 1” ACL ($7.8M) and $1.3M acquisition costs, offset by tax effects .
- NIM near-term drag (excess liquidity, sub-debt) is manageable; management aims to hold NIM at high end of 4.25–4.35% via funding mix and deposit pricing discipline .
- Loan growth visibility improved: Verdant’s $150–$200M/qtr plus floor plan ramp support low-to-mid-teens growth guidance; operating leverage expected as AI initiatives scale .
- Credit remains a differentiator: NPAs and charge-offs remain low; management highlighting structural discipline and anti-fraud measures amid industry headlines .
- Securities/custody momentum: AUC/AUA reached $43B, with tech modernization positioning cross-sell of banking products to RIAs—a multi-year revenue synergy opportunity .
- Watchlist for next quarter: pace of Verdant production and integration, progression of NIB deposits, NIM trajectory as excess liquidity normalizes, and expense growth within the 30% guardrail .
- Trading angle: EPS upside vs consensus and raised loan growth guide are positive; revenue-definition mismatch vs consensus can create headline volatility—focus on NII, NIM drivers, and adjusted EPS sustainability .
Values marked with * in the Estimates sections are retrieved from S&P Global.